I
am a skeptic. I don’t generally believe in the supernatural. I do believe in
God—to me there is too much evidence of a divine creator of the universe not
to. But I put no faith in ESP, telekinesis, Bigfoot, alien abductions, remote
viewing, mediums and fortune telling, ghosts, astrology, or any of the other
things claiming to be supernatural. Why? Evidence.
The
skeptic’s creed is “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” Not
proof, mind you, but evidence. Don’t get me wrong, I would love for any of those
things to exist or be real. Who wouldn’t want proof of an alien culture? To
picnic with Bigfoot? To know tomorrow’s sports scores? I don’t think any of
those things are beyond the realm of possibility. But I believe in the
scientific method for testing the natural world.
The
biggest problem is that there are too many natural explanations for seemingly
supernatural events. The famous Loch Ness Monster photo from the ‘40s has been
thoroughly debunked, as has the Patterson Bigfoot film. The Skeptical Inquirer
is a monthly magazine that looks at supernatural phenomena through the lens of
the scientific method and the supernatural comes up short every time.
 |
| The Amazing Randi |
James Randi is an inspiration to skeptics everywhere. He not only exposes fake
“psychics” and notions of all kinds, but his foundation offers a $1 million
reward for any proof of psychic powers. The arguments I’ve heard against Randi
are laughable. “No psychic would take that dare, money is not important to
them.” Really? When is the last time Madame Zanzabob offered a palm reading
free? Why not prove to the world you are a legitimate psychic, then donate the
money to your favorite charity? Why? Because there are no provable psychic
powers. Almost every UFO story can be explained rationally if you look at it
close enough (except a recent one in Iran—more about that in the future but it
really rocks the world). Back to Bigfoot—there are entire families of 8-foot
hominids roaming throughout North America, but no one has taken a reasonably
good photo? Or found a decomposing body? Or given them beef jerky?
Don’t
get me started on the ridiculous “ghost chasing” shows. Educationally-challenged,
spiky-haired troglodytes wander through deserted buildings at night and think
they see stuff? Uh, yeah, it’s dark and scary in there. And I love their “EVP”
recordings of ghost voices. Someone hears “Ummmmmmmmm,” and instead of
realizing it’s an electric generator, shouts “OMG! It’s the preamble to the
Constitution!” Not that such shows are meant to be taken seriously, but I’ve
sat in rooms with people watching them that swallow the stuff hook, line and
sinker. I would love to see a counterpoint show of skeptics giving alternative,
rational explanations of what people are seeing and hearing. I’m not sure that
would be a ratings winner, but perhaps it would be. It definitely wouldn’t be
as exploitive.
Extraordinary
claims require extraordinary evidence. Make no claims without it.